Testseek.com have collected 149 expert reviews of the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm X-Pro1.
March 2012
(82%)
149 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(88%)
99 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
820100149
Reviews
page 14 of 15
Order by:
Score
Published: 2012-08-16, Author: Michael , review by: gizmodo.in
If you have the money—and its a lot of money—yes, buy it. It isnt just style without substance here. Its not a point-and-shoot. It is a camera that might make you work a bit, but it will reward you with great pictures (and jealousy from your photog fri...
Abstract: Fujifilm's most ambitious camera ever has retro appeal in abundance, but it's one frustrating step from perfection. Whereas the gorgeous but non-lens-swapping Fujifilm X100 had the silvery look of a 1950s Leica, the lens-enabled X-Pro1 is a little more '7...
New sensor design delivers very sharp images even at base apertures, True Rangefinder-like experience, Good selection of prime lenses that take good advantage of the sensor
Relatively slow AF, Changing from photo to video mode a little cumbersome, Too expensive, especially given the competition in the sub 50K range
Rs. 1,04,999. That's how much the X-Pro1 costs, without a lens. Let that sink in for a bit. Clearly this isn't a mirrorless meant for the average user, given not only its price, but its design as well. This isn't meant to match DSLRs that cost as much, bu...
Published: 2012-04-13, Author: Erik , review by: shoot.be
De Fujifilm X-Pro 1 is waarschijnlijk een camera waarop je verliefd moet zijn om hem te waarderen. Als je warm wordt van het retrodesign, je hart sneller slaat wanneer je door de hybride zoeker kijkt, en je vlinders in je buik krijgt wanneer je mag doen a...
X-Trans CMOS sensor is very resistant to moiré; lack of a low pass filter captures more detail than any other APS-C sensor we've tried; controls are logical and well designed.
Pretty expensive; autofocus is slow especially in low light.
Despite autofocus that's a bit on the slow side and its retro looks, the X-Pro1 really does stand toe-to-toe with the best 16-megapixel cameras from any of the big manufacturers in terms of image quality. Handling is great and so is the weight and fee...
Finely detailed images with low noise, Bright optical viewfinder, Faster buffer than X100
Sluggish autofocus, High price
For better and for worse, the Fujifilm X-Pro1 is a lot like its predecessor, the X100. There really is nothing like either the X100 or the X-Pro1, both cameras are unique photographic tools which owners will likely both love and hate.The X-Pro1's handling...
Finely detailed images with low noise, Bright optical viewfinder, Faster buffer than X100
Sluggish autofocus
For better and for worse, the Fujifilm X-Pro1 is a lot like its predecessor, the X100. There really is nothing like either the X100 or the X-Pro1, both cameras are unique photographic tools which owners will likely both love and hate.The X-Pro1's handl...
Abstract: THERE has been much talk about this new Fujifilm camera that has apparently garnered a waiting list of buyers. It is not a cheap camera by any means, costing some $2,400 just for the body and with only three prime lenses available. The X-Pro1 comes with a...
