sg.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i7 875K 2.93GHz Socket 1156



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 875K 2.93GHz Socket 1156

Testseek.com have collected 86 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 875K 2.93GHz Socket 1156 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 875K 2.93GHz Socket 1156.
Award: Most Awarded June 2010
June 2010
 
(82%)
86 Reviews
Users
(92%)
187 Reviews
82 0 100 86

 

Reviews

page 6 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-05-27, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  Now our particular samples weren't exactly that great when we actually got down to overclocking. We certainly could have achieved similar results with default locked multipliers. We don't believe that Intel is binning these K-series processors for their overclokability, nor have Intel ever claimed to be doing so. Having said that, it will..

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-05-27, review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Abstract:  All things considered, I think Intel has a winning proposition with the introduction of these processors to the market. They offer a flexibility in overclocking that was in the past reserved for the biggest (and most expensive) dog on the block in Intel's lineup. They come in at a reasonable price point and overclock like stink. If a socket 1156 rig is in your future, then the i7 875 should be the processor for you.

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-10-26, Author: Paul , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  Intel’s reign of dominance in the CPU market hasn’t skipped a beat this year, and now two more processors from the Californian chip maker enter the fray aiming to catch the eye of both system builders and overclockers – namely the Core i5 655K and the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-08-19, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Presler/Cedar Mill Pentium 4 / D Tick 65 nm 2006 Conroe/Merom Core 2 Duo/Quad Tock 65 nm 2006 Penryn Core 2 Duo/Quad Tick 45 nm 2007 Nehalem Core i Tock 45...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-26, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't have multiple cores? We take 16 different CPUs and compare them all using a single core running at 3 GHz. Ev...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-08-12, review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • With the Core i7 875K Intel makes the LGA 1156 platform even more interesting for overclockers and PC-Enthusiasts. Combined with a Triple-Channel memory-kit this CPU performs very well. The strength definitely are single-threaded applicaitons which is ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-07-20, review by: techradar.com

  • Lots of overclocking options, Awesome performance, Cheaper than an 870
  • No extra OC headroom
  • A nice addition to the range for enthusiasts, but not cost effective for ordinary punters.Follow TechRadar Reviews on Twitter...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-28, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  The same performance would be replicated across other software which uses a similar workload so we get great multi-core performance thanks to the 4CPUs/8threads and excellent performance in applications which support fewer cores thanks to..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
    page 6 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×