Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: Website: http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/amdfx/Pages/amdfx.aspxRRP FX-4350: £95 (At time of the review)RRP FX-6350: £105 (At time of the review)RRP FX-8350: £155 (At time of the review)I am going to be taking a look at AMDs latest “Piled...
Abstract: Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...
Abstract: On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2013-04-08, Author: James , review by: micromart.co.uk
Abstract: AMD's Piledriver line (which succeeds Bulldozer) has been attempting to pull back ground from Intel since its release, primarily through aggressive discounts. One of the few AMD chips that can even start to compete on performance grounds is this, the eigh...
Abstract: AMD and Intel continue serving up increasingly faster CPUs. But graphics card performance is accelerating even faster. Is there still such a thing as processor-bound gaming? We take two Radeon HD 7970s, high-end desktop CPUs, and a few games to find ou...
Abstract: Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2012-11-08, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com
Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...
Abstract: It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...
